| |
PLATELET-RICH PLASMA 2009
PLATELET-RICH PLASMA (PRP): EVIDENCE FOR CLINICAL AND THERAPEUTIC USE
The leading definitive published work covering important fields in surgery, regarding the application of autologous PRP-gel (A-PRP) in aesthetics, plastic surgery and therapeutics, arguably, has been recorded by Professor Robert Marx, an oral and maxillofacial surgeon of repute, and high academic standing, from the University of Miami in the United States(1). Marx et al from the United States and his academic platform has provided evidence, proof-of-concept, regarding the following clinically and relevant scientific aspects of PRP (1):
- Definition of PRP
- Science of PRP
- Mechanism of PRP related to growth factors
- Role of PRP in soft and hard tissue healing and regeneration
- Platelet separation and concentration
- Storage and activation of PRP
- FDA approved office devices for the use of PRP
The application of PRP-gel is well known to surgeons and has a role to play in wound healing (1). It has proven safe, because it is autologous in nature and thereby precludes the danger of infection transmission, provided the plasma-gel is not contaminated during the processing (1). Comparative studies have demonstrated that platelet-yields and growth-factor release/concentration vary somewhat, depending on which device is used to prepare the PRP and how the platelets are activated. REGENLAB-PRP™ blood collection tubes (CE marked), and distributed by Omnimed (Pty.,Ltd) in South Africa, render good results compared to others (2). As of 2008, a new commercial system for the preparation of PRP was launched in Europe, and is marketed as Plateltex®. The technical performance, regarding FDA approved and non-approved devices for clinical generation from human whole venous-blood, has been reported (2). Plateltex® produces rapid batroxibin-induced enzymatic gelation and is suitable for topical application. The Italian group have indicated that Plateltex® is comparable to those of most of the other available systems (2). However, Plateltex® that relies on batroxibin enzyme to induce gelation, acts differently from thrombin (2), which is used by most other systems ( including bovine thrombin[1]).Platelets treated with batroxibin do not become activated, these are apparently entrapped within the fibrin network and offer special advantages at the point of treatment (2).One of the advantages of batroxibin-induced platelet gel is that PRP activation by this enzyme may tailor slow release of the platelet content, possibly providing a more predictable availability of trophic factors (2). The manufacturer of Plateltex®, have indicated that this durable “anabolic factor” availability might be preferable to quick thrombin-induced growth factor release (2). In South Africa , the market leader is REGENLAB™, from Switzerland. The REGENKIT™ and blood collection tubes are used both in the clinic for wound healing and aesthetics (for PRP-mesotherapy, plasma resurfacing and facial rejuvenation) and distributed in South Africa by OMNIMED (Pty),(Ltd) in Randburg. More details on batroxibin-induced PRP activation can be perused at www.plateltex.com. For activation of the platelets, the following are clinical choices available: calcium chloride, calcium gluconate, human and bovine thrombin and ADP( recent Italian studies): Du Toit and co-workers, working independently in Cape Town, have reported on the biological activity of batroxibin-induced gel (PLATELTEX®) and thrombin-induced gel ( REGENLAB® and REGENKIT®) in biological tissue culture ( see Plateltex® within www.bolandcell.co.za) .Du Toit ( from Cape Town) and Borzini ( from Italy) et al, have reviewed in publication format the application of Regenlab™ and Plateltex® generated autologous PRP in wound care and aesthetic medicine (3).Du Toit and co-workers have further reviewed the clinical application of A-PRP for top journals and added new innovative cell biology , local African experience and tissue culture aspects (4,5). In South Africa, there are 4 systems and devices available commercially to generate PRP. And it seems that there are more on the way. Very favourable healing results have been reported in diabetics with foot ulceration treated with platelet-rich plasma and platelet-gels and confirmed in Cape Town(6).PRP and the role in wound healing is important and reflected in the number of ongoing FDA-approved clinical trials ( Cytomedix® Autologel®, patellar retinacular injuries, Biomet®[ Achilles tendinopathy, tennis elbow],cardiac surgery at The Royal Brompton Hospital, NHS, lower extremity bypass surgery, diabetic foot ulceration and plantar fasciitis)(7).
PRP AND COSMETIC CLINICAL TRIALS: PLATELET-GEL AND PLASMA RESURFACING
There are no registered FDA protocols regarding PRP ( activated platelets with growth factor release) and wrinkle amelioration or rejuvenation of the facial skin, at the time of posting, which attests to the controversial ethical and scientific problems regarding this niche market. Open-ended, uncontrolled studies conducted in non-academic private clinics in England, France, Ireland, Japan and China using the REGENLAB® System has suggested possibility of benefit. For the moment there is no robust science or proof-of-science that PRP plays a major role in facial rejuvenation. Skin analysis have been too crude to detect subtle dermal histological changes. Open-ended studies suggest improvement in skin texture, no effect is visible to underlying age-related pigmentation. Major issues that have marred research in this area has been problems with inconsistent generation of PRP in commercial laboratories by inexperienced workers, complex wrinkle classification, photoaging versus chronological aging and inaccurate skin measurement instruments that are variable in results(even on the same spot). Major obstacles that have precluded FDA trials with PRP and aesthetic medicine include:
- Non standardization of blood collection tubes and devices
- Poor correlation with platelet-count and platelet-activity in some collection systems
- Poor quality assurance and application by inexperienced practitioners
- Differing release of platelet-derived growth factors
- Different ways of activating platelets ( i.e. calcium chloride, gluconate, ADP etc)
- Non-responders in open labelled studies, due to varying degrees of photoaging, and poor quality PRP or processing devices
- Inability in open labelled studies to ameliorate mild crow-feet and nasolabial wrinkles
- Failure of new generation ultrasound devices to accurately measure skin dermal changes after PRP insertion ( see other FDA studies)
- Measurement and quantification/standardization failure regards PRP
- Ethnic differences in response to PRP
- Preliminary data that shows that PRP-gel for plasma resurfacing produces inferior results compared to simple chemical peels or exfoliation.
- Inability of PRP to address lipo-atrophy which forms a major part of aging of the face
- Inability of PRP to restore age-degraded collagen and elastin fibers in preliminary work, thereby failing to ameliorate sagging, elastosis and mid-face ptosis
- Inability of PRP to restore eluanin and oxytalin fibres in the dermis in preliminary work
- Poor skin histological studies after PRP rejuvenation to show that end-point analyses are met
- Possibility that PDGF can activate quiescent BCC and SCC which are common on the aged-face having been exposed to UV light.
- Recent data indicates that PRP results are inferior to those of basic acupuncture due to needling, and that the results of PRP are not necessarily attributable to the platelet-gel growth factors but may be due to the mechanical needling effect.
- Heterogenous nature of photoaging, poor case selection and accelerated chronological aging
However in academic medicine, Marx and co-workers, from Miami, USA, have shown advanced healing of diabetic foot ulceration, rapid healing of skin flaps after face-lifts resulting in reduced inflammation, erythema, swelling and rapid epitheliazation in recipients of PRP(1). This is facilitated by application of the activated PRP to the under surface of the skin-SMAS flap and along the skin incision(1).Marx and workers (2005) have shown that PRP can improve haemostasis, improve flap adherence and accelerate the return of skin sensation via its growth factor stimulation (1). The plasma factors in autologous PRP is a potent stimulus for cells in tissue culture, including fibroblasts, but not more than bovine or foetal calf serum. This has been the experience in Cape Town. See Tissue Culture menu on www.bolandcell.co.za for more information and cell morphology. Du Toit and co-workers, of Cape Town have the most experience regarding PRP generation and application in the clinic and aesthetics with various products in South Africa and have extensive unsurpassed back-up publications in the medical literature, supported by oral presentations at academic and aesthetic congresses ( during 2007, 2008).
CELL THERAPY, FIBROBLASTS AND CLINICAL TRIALS IN COSMETIC AND THE BEAUTY INDUSTRY
Currently the only approved fibroblast cell therapy FDA protocol, at the time of posting, is of ISOLAGEN INC, that is active but not recruiting. Various factors have contributed to this situation. William Boss, of the United States, is accredited as the doyen of fibroblast auto-transplantation for human living fibroblasts for the amelioration of rhytids; the “ISOLAGEN PROCESS” being patented. Some units have attempted to co-culture human fibroblasts with the donor platelet-rich plasma (PRP).The results have been equivocal with the use of autologous human serum, autologous PRP or bovine/foetal calf serum. In Europe, the biotechnological process of platelet-rich plasma and fibroblast ex vivo cell proliferation has been patented by REGENLAB™, a biotechnology laboratory in Mollen, Switzerland (PTC patent issued during 2007, protecting cell processing in PRP based-mediums). Du Toit and co-workers, from Cape Town, have the largest laboratory and clinical experience of the “ Isolagen Process and manufacture” in South Africa and are active in the field(8). See www.regenlab.com for more information on REGENLAB™, REGENKIT™ and availability of collection tubes in South Africa. Major obstacles that have hampered skin rejuvenation efforts with the clinical application of the patients own living cells (fibroblasts) in commercial laboratories include:
- Quality assurance problems in manufacture and clinical application by inexperienced practitioners
- Great expense and labour intensity of ex vivo cell proliferation, logistics of tissue transport, making the process cost ineffective in the era of LED, peels, IPL, Botox and carboxytherapy
- Contamination, especially if autologous human serum or PRP is used
- Poor quantification of cellular activity at biochemistry level, cellular membrane, and SEM, flow cytometry and specific markers after cell release with enzymes
- Dangers of cell therapy on the face in “fields of growth” ( for SCC,BCC and melanoma)
- Limited areas that can be re-surfaced, compared to chemical peels and LED therapy that can treat the whole face and neck within 20 minutes and the results of LED are far superior as assessed by advanced skin physiological analysis
- Insensitive skin analysis ( of both epidermis and dermis including physiological data) after fibroblast cell therapy, including ultrasound
- Failure of simultaneous administration of PRP and living cultured autologous-fibroblasts in order to enhance subdermal cell-retention/engraftment or prevent cell-death shortly after cell implantation. What is not known is the % cell retention after engraftment as well as in vivo viability after cell delivery into the skin dermis. The combination therapy of living cells and PRP does not appear synergistic in the skin rejuvenation process.
- Failure to differentiate the rejuvenation by living cultured fibroblasts from the needle pricks as the latter is known to facilitate the process after acupuncture. Is the rejuvenation effect due to the needling-effect ( that also induces and stimulates healing) or due to the engrafted living cultured fibroblasts? Is it not dermal myofibroblasts that are responsible for the rhytid amelioration, in which case clinical trials will need skin biopsies and markers staining for vimentin.
- Unanswered questions that remain: are transplanted living fibroblasts capable of the amelioration and restoration of damaged elastin and oxytalin fibres and lipoatrophy? Again, skin biopsies and sophisticated histology including immuno-cytochemistry with surface markers, is needed and will have to be a standard as used to evaluate laser skin rejuvenation. Pointless to transplant living cells with and without PRP if important issues such as elastic fibre damage, eluanin and oxytalin fibre renewal within the dermis is not achieved and lipoatrophy remains unaffected. These are some of the major anti-aging end-points that one hoped living cultured fibroblasts may improve, but at the moment no proof-of-science prevails
- Danger of inducing a major immunologic reaction with the use of allogeneic human fibroblasts
- Variable, non-durable and inconsistent results due to donor fibroblast-cell retention failure in the recipient, that will not be enhanced or ameliorated by Platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Du Toit and co-researchers, working independently in Cape Town during 2008, indicate that these are important in end-point analysis and more research in academic units is needed.
- Availability and competition of photo-facial devices, Botox, new skin chemical peels, modern IPL and fractional or mosaic lasers, have placed autologous fibroblast transplantation or rejuvenation with PRP in a special category of biological skin renewal.
MORE INFORMATION ON APPLICATION OF PRP IN SOUTH AFRICA ( Aesthetics and therapeutics: demonstrations, equipment and training)
Contact: Omnimed (Pty) (Ltd), Randburg, South Africa. Sammi van Rooyen, National Sales Manager at (011) 792-7120
REFERENCES
- Marx RE, Garg AK. Dental and craniofacial applications of platelet-rich plasma. Quintessence books and publishing Co., Chicago, 2005. 1-154.
- Mazzucco L, et al. Platelet-rich plasma and platelet preparation using Plateltex®. Vox Sang 2008:94:202-8.
- Du Toit DF, Borzini P, et al. New advances in biological wound care and aesthetic medicine, including use of platelet-rich plasma. The Specialist Forum. 2008:8;15-23.
- Du Toit DF, Kleintjes W et al. Shoulder Surgeon and autologous cellular regeneration (ACR) with platelet-rich plasma. International Jnl of Shoulder Surgery 2007:1:87-95 ( Published on the Internet).
- Du Toit DF, Kleintjes W et al. Soft and hard tissue augmentation with platelet-rich plasma: tissue culture dynamics, regeneration and molecular biology perspectives. International Jnl of Shoulder Surgery 2007;1:64-73 (published on the Internet)
- Driver VR et al. A prospective, randomised, controlled trial of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006:52,68-70 ( Cytomedix, INC.,Rockville,USA).
- Federal Drug Agency Communications( FDA , USA):2008
- Du Toit et al. Biotechnological anti-aging cell-therapy treatment of facial wrinkles with cultured human fibroblasts. The Specialist Forum 2005:5, 38-46
Table-1: COSMETIC/AESTHETIC PRP-UPDATE 2010. BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE , CLINICAL AND BASIC SCIENCES REGARDING PLATELET-RICH PLASMA (PRP): After Marx 2005 et al. |
- PRP releases seven growth-factors (GF) from activated platelets: these GF promote healing and regeneration ( tissue healing and biocellular regeneration).Thus, the GF are relevant to wound-healing
- PRP is autogenous blood clot and contains concentrated numbers of platelets ( about 4-7 times baseline is needed for clinical benefit)
- The alpha-granules of the platelet store the GF (PDGF, TGF,VEGF,EGF): GF are proteins and need to be biologically active to work: biological actions: stimulate mesenchymal stem cells and resident adult cells to replicate, osteoblast replication, endothelial cell-replication, fibroblast and osteoblast-replication to produce collagen, enhance bone-regeneration, stimulate matrix-formation, stimulation of pericytes, epidermal-regeneration and re-surfacing
- PRP is not stem-cell therapy, but is non-invasive and fairly safe
- PRP does not contain stem cells of any relevance, but may be directed at resident stem cells that are up-regulated after injection to replicate together with other mesenchymal cells
- The platelet alpha-granules also contain cell-adhesion molecules and involved with vitronectin, fibronectin, fibrin
- The GF have two active sites each and are called dimers
- PRP: 94% platelets, 5% RBC, 1% WBC and no stem cells of note
- Enhancement of autogenous bone-grafts used in maxilla-facial surgery and orthopaedics
- PRP can be considered for facial-regeneration /rejuvenation but the effects only last for 6-months and other complimentary treatments such as RF are needed to back-up or bolster the plasma. Stand-alone PRP-treatment is insufficient to reverse or ameliorate ageing and add-ons are needed
- Enhanced proliferation of skin basal cells ( stem cells of the epithelium): following blood-clot formation (improved donor-site healing after skin-graft)
- Enhancement of osteointegration ( relevant to implant-surgery)
- NB: Poor technique can render poor quality and PRP enrichment: one needs to concentrate viable bioactive platelets. Therefore the best PRP processing device is needed.
- PRP can be used during stem cell transplantation and the biological action is referred to as: PROLIFERATION-PROMOTING EFFECT (may be used with human adipose-derived stem cells and human dermal-fibroblasts: see Kakudo et al, Plast Reconstruct Surg 2008: 1352-60). Therefore PRP application can be utilised for cell-based, soft-tissue engineering and wound-healing
- The topical efficacy, and level - evidence, has been demonstrated in the treatment of diabetic-foot ulceration. Numerous indications for PRP are described in cranio-facial surgery: bone grafting, rhytidectomy, face-lift, fat-grafting and transfer
- Potent cell proliferation enhancer ex vivo using fibroblasts, adipose-derived stem cells, keratinocytes
- Controversial areas: PRP-MESOTHERAPY for facial rejuvenation and repair of solar-aged changes, sagging, wrinkling. The problems include unpredictable inconsistency, poor and no-response in some clients. It is an international experience. This is a feature of biologicals and applies to stem cell application at the time of posting. Need for additional facial back-up RF treatment is mandatory after PRP-MESOTHERAPY to reach benchmark cosmetic-output. Is it not the RF that is working or the PRP? For the moment cosmetic-scientists are not sure if subdermal and subcutaneous injections of PRP are superior to other established cosmetic treatments. Established cosmetic clinics have demonstrated that PRP-FACELIFT is not superior to superficial chemical-peel plus LED, IPL or fractionated laser. BOTOX and fillers are far superior to PRP in gaining quick results. PRP- mesotherapy is far more costly than BOTOX or DYSPORT. PRP is not stem cell therapy and cannot turn back the ageing clock completely. More robust science and evidence is needed. But it seems that PRP may well have a place in the cosmetic armamentarium of the cosmetic surgeon, dermatologist and aesthetic physician. PRP is more established in therapeutics at the clinic but not in the beauty salon.
- Dermatological or plastic surgery consultation. Such a consultation is essential to assess if you are a suitable client for such treatment
- References: Marx and Garg 2005, Quintessence; Kumar et al, Robbin’s Basic Pathology, 2007, 8th Edition, International Edition; Du Toit et al, The Specialist Forum 2007:7; 30-31.
- PRODUCTS AVAILABLE IN RSA: Regen-PRP® (REGENKIT®) (Cost: R800 per tube); MyCells® (Neokit®) (costs: R1300 per tube).PRP-mesotherapy demonstration of technique is available on the Internet: See U-Tube demos by various doctors.
- DISCLAIMER: This site provides no medical or cosmetic advice or recommendation and therefore an aesthetic expert should be consulted regarding any facial treatment, treatment choices to the neck, décolleté or dorsal aspects of the hands.
- Formulation: BIOMED Expert and Specialist.
- WEBSITE UPGRADING AND UPDATING: 16 November 2009. See BOLAND CELL menu: PRP UPDATE 2010.
|
POSTED 15/10/2008
 
|
|